AFSPA Extension in Assam: A License for Atrocities or Essential Security Measure?
The extension of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) in four districts of Assam, namely Tinsukia, Dibrugarh, Charaideo, and Sivasagar, has sparked renewed debate and criticism over its continued implementation. The state government's decision to prolong the enforcement of AFSPA until September 30, 2024, has reignited concerns regarding its implications for human rights and civil liberties in the region.
AFSPA, initially imposed in
Assam in November 1990, has been subject to periodic extensions every six
months following a review by the state government. Despite the recent
withdrawal of AFSPA from four districts of Assam in October 2023, its
persistent application in other areas has drawn condemnation from various
quarters.
Critics argue that AFSPA
grants excessive powers to the armed forces and Central Armed Police Forces
(CAPF), allowing for arbitrary arrests, extrajudicial killings, and other human
rights abuses. The law's provision of immunity from prosecution and legal
recourse for security forces has been cited as contributing to a sense of
impunity and a culture of violence.
The tragic incident on
December 4, 2021, involving the killing of six civilians by a unit of the 21st
Para Special Forces of the Indian Army near the village of Oting in the Mon
District of Nagaland, further underscores the urgent need for a re-evaluation
of AFSPA. Subsequent clashes resulting in additional casualties have only intensified
calls for accountability and justice.
While security forces argue
that AFSPA is necessary for maintaining public order in conflict-affected
areas, critics contend that peace and stability cannot be achieved through
draconian measures and undemocratic means. The widespread misuse and documented
instances of human rights violations associated with AFSPA underscore its
incompatibility with the principles of a democratic society.
As the debate surrounding
AFSPA continues, there is a pressing need for meaningful dialogue, legal
reforms, and accountability mechanisms to address the underlying grievances and
ensure the protection of human rights in conflict-affected regions. The
extension of AFSPA in Assam and the region serves as a stark reminder of the
challenges and complexities inherent in balancing security concerns with the
fundamental rights and freedoms of civilians.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author's. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of The Critical Script or its editor.
Newsletter!!!
Subscribe to our weekly Newsletter and stay tuned.
Related Comments