China’s Harassment of Arunachal Citizens Is Not a Visa Issue. It’s a Sovereignty Test, And India Must Respond Like One
On
21 November 2025, Ms Pema Wangjom Thongdok of Arunachal Pradesh was travelling
from London to Japan with a layover in Shanghai. At the Pudong Airport transit
zone, Chinese immigration officials declared her Indian passport “invalid”
because it listed Arunachal Pradesh as her place of birth, firmly
claiming “Arunachal is part of China.”
Her ordeal, lasting nearly 18 hours, was not a mere administrative glitch; it
was a sharp reminder of the geopolitical tensions that loom large over India’s
northeastern border state. A citizen embarking on an innocent international
journey was detained in transit because her identity, tied to Arunachal, was
treated as controversial. The message was clear: for China, visas are more than
travel permits; they are instruments of territorial assertion.
This
incident is the latest in a troubling arc of similar episodes. For years,
residents from Arunachal Pradesh have faced stapled visas, refusals, and
delays when dealing with Chinese authorities. What was once an entry-level barrier
has now spread into transit rights and global travel mobility. By refusing to
recognise a valid Indian passport simply because it lists Arunachal, China is
engaging in a form of citizenship discrimination rooted in its claim over the
region.
This
is not about travel discomfort. It is about sovereignty- India’s claim over
Arunachal, reflected in every passport, every traveller, every citizen. When
transit rights are undermined, it signals that Beijing is willing to apply its
territorial argument beyond the Himalayas, into airports, lanes and global
mobility systems.
India’s
response has been proper: a diplomatic demarche was lodged, the consulate
intervened, and the woman was finally allowed to continue her journey. Yet formal protests alone will not suffice. The pattern
demands strategic redress. India must treat these discriminatory acts as part
of the larger territorial contest, not as isolated consular incidents.
For
Arunachal Pradesh, the implications are profound. The state already navigates
issues of connectivity, development and national integration. Now, its citizens
face a unique form of mobility disadvantage, where one’s place of birth can
become a barrier to travel. This deepens disenfranchisement and raises valid
questions about equality of citizenship in practice on the global stage.
As early as 2011, India’s Ministry of External Affairs reported that
several residents of Arunachal Pradesh were issued stapled visas by the
Chinese Embassy instead of regular visas. Stapled visas are printed on loose
sheets, not affixed to passports, allowing China to avoid “acknowledging”
Arunachal as part of India. India rejected these visas as invalid, preventing
the individuals from travelling. Similar discriminatory visa practices have
continued sporadically over the years.
In
2023, three Wushu athletes from Arunachal Pradesh were barred from
participating in the Asian Games in Hangzhou after China issued them
stapled visas. India protested strongly, calling the move “unacceptable” and
withdrew its entire Wushu contingent in solidarity.
The
Shanghai incident represents a worrying expansion from entry visas to international
transit mobility. Even Indians flying from one foreign country to another,
not seeking to enter China, may now face interrogation and detention if their
documents reflect Arunachal Pradesh.
Such
extraterritorial interference directly contradicts international aviation norms
governing transit passengers.
India
must elevate this issue. It must insist on uniform visa treatment for all
Indian citizens. It must document and publicise all such incidents. It must
engage international aviation and human rights bodies. It must treat
Arunachal’s citizens’ rights as non-negotiable.
Ms
Thongdok’s ordeal may have ended late that night, but the message she received
lingers: your birthplace, your region of India, can determine your freedom to
travel. That is unacceptable. For Arunachal. For India. It is time to respond
firmly because respect for sovereignty and respect for its citizens go hand in
hand.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author's. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of The Critical Script or its editor.
Newsletter!!!
Subscribe to our weekly Newsletter and stay tuned.














Related Comments