
Jinnah Before Gandhi: From Unity to Partition - The Divergence of Two National Leaders
The independence movement of India was shaped by towering personalities,
among whom Mahatma Gandhi and Muhammad Ali Jinnah are perhaps the most
defining. While Gandhi is celebrated as the Father
of the Nation in India, Jinnah holds that role in Pakistan. What is often
overlooked, however, is that Jinnah was already a well-established political
figure in British India before Gandhi’s return from South Africa in 1915. Their
initial cordial relationship, based on shared aspirations for Indian self-rule,
would ultimately give way to deep ideological rifts — resulting in the historic
partition of the Indian subcontinent in 1947.
Jinnah’s Early Rise in Indian Politics
Born in 1876 in Karachi, Muhammad Ali Jinnah studied law in London at
Lincoln’s Inn and returned to India in 1896. By the early 1900s, Jinnah had
entered the political arena, distinguishing himself with a sharp legal mind,
impeccable English, and a moderate constitutional approach to Indian self-rule.
●
1906: Jinnah was
present in Calcutta when the All-India Muslim League was founded, though he did
not join until 1913.
●
1909: He was elected
to the Imperial Legislative Council, the highest legislative body for Indians
under the Raj.
●
1910–1920: Jinnah
gained a reputation as a liberal nationalist, often collaborating with the
Indian National Congress, which he joined in 1906. He supported secular
principles and worked for Hindu-Muslim cooperation.
●
He was widely
respected for his role in the 1916 Lucknow Pact, which brought together the
Muslim League and Congress on a common platform for constitutional reforms.
This was seen as a triumph of his diplomacy and belief in unity.
By 1915 — the year Gandhi returned to India — Jinnah was already hailed
as the "Ambassador of Hindu-Muslim Unity", a title given by none
other than Sarojini Naidu, a senior Congress leader.
Gandhi’s Return and Emerging Leadership
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, born in 1869, was older than Jinnah by seven
years but had spent two crucial decades in South Africa (1893–1915). There, he
developed his philosophy of Satyagraha (non-violent resistance) and fought
against racial injustice.
Upon his return to India in 1915, Gandhi was still relatively unknown in
Indian political circles. He spent his initial years touring the country,
understanding grassroots conditions. His political campaigns in Champaran
(1917), Kheda (1918), and Ahmedabad (1918) won him recognition as a people's
leader.
It was only in 1919, with the Rowlatt Act agitation and the aftermath of
the JallianwalaBagh massacre, that Gandhi emerged as a national leader and
assumed full control of the Congress.
Jinnah and Gandhi: Early Relationship
The early relationship between Jinnah and Gandhi was cordial, if
somewhat cautious. They met in Bombay in 1915, shortly after Gandhi's return.
●
Jinnah welcomed
Gandhi and even chaired one of the early meetings organized in Gandhi’s honor.
● However, the two differed in methods and vision:
○
Jinnah believed in
constitutionalism, legislative reforms, and negotiations within the British
framework.
○
Gandhi favored mass
mobilization, non-cooperation, and direct civil disobedience - a path Jinnah
saw as emotional and unpredictable.
In 1920, when Gandhi launched the Non-Cooperation Movement, Jinnah
resigned from the Congress in protest. He wrote a famous letter criticizing the
mixing of religion with politics and the abandonment of constitutional methods.
"Your methods
are not those by which nations are created. They may succeed in a village or a
town, but not in the complex and vast Indian society." — Jinnah to Gandhi, 1920
Ideological Divergence and Political Rivalry
The 1920s and 1930s witnessed an increasing divergence:
●
Jinnah, sidelined
during Gandhi's rise in mass politics, moved to London in the mid-1930s in
disillusionment.
●
Gandhi dominated the
Congress and the national movement with successive campaigns of civil
disobedience and jail terms, becoming a global icon of nonviolence.
By 1935, with the Government of India Act offering more provincial
autonomy, Jinnah returned to lead the Muslim League, now shifting toward the
idea that Muslims were not just a minority, but a "nation" in their
own right.
The 1937 elections were a turning point. The Congress swept the polls
but refused to form coalition governments with the Muslim League in most
provinces. Jinnah saw this as evidence that Muslims would be politically
marginalized in a Hindu-majority India.
From Political Differences to Partition
By the early 1940s, the differences between Gandhi and Jinnah had
hardened into two competing visions of India:
Gandhi |
Jinnah |
Advocated a united India with Hindu-Muslim harmony. |
Advocated for Pakistan, a separate Muslim homeland. |
Believed religion had a moral, but not political role. |
Saw Muslims as a distinct political nation. |
Used mass civil disobedience. |
Preferred negotiation, diplomacy, and statecraft. |
●
1940: The Lahore Resolution was passed by the Muslim League, demanding
independent Muslim states (later interpreted as Pakistan).
●
1947: After failed
talks (like the Cripps Mission, Cabinet Mission Plan), the British finally
agreed to Partition, with Gandhi remaining one of its most vocal opponents till
the end.
Two Fathers of Two Nations
Gandhi and Jinnah began their political careers with shared ideals of
Indian self-rule, legal methods, and secularism. But their personal
philosophies, leadership styles, and visions of India's future diverged
sharply.
By the time of independence:
●
Gandhi had become
the symbol of peace, pluralism, and nonviolence.
●
Jinnah, once a
secular constitutionalist, had become the sole spokesman of Muslim political
identity, leading to the creation of Pakistan.
They rarely met face-to-face in their later years, and when they did,
their meetings were marked more by mutual disappointment than cooperation.
Legacy
●
Gandhi was
assassinated in 1948, just months after independence, by a Hindu nationalist
who blamed him for being "too soft" on Muslims.
●
Jinnah, gravely ill
during Partition, died in September 1948 — having seen Pakistan born but not
stabilized.
Their legacies continue to shape India-Pakistan relations, national
identity debates, and political thought in South Asia.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author's. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of The Critical Script or its editor.

Newsletter!!!
Subscribe to our weekly Newsletter and stay tuned.
Related Comments